<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CIO strategy: mystery, art or science?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/cio-strategy-art-science-or-mystery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/cio-strategy-art-science-or-mystery/</link>
	<description>joined-up management for a joined-up world ™ by Colin Beveridge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/cio-strategy-art-science-or-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=725#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>As far as I understand, the CIO&#039;s job really is to &#039;work him/herself out of a job&#039; so by rights, since 1999, the target should have changed. 

I think the next trend in this should be to focus on the users, focus on making the most out of people&#039;s individual knowledge as well as supporting more collaboration. We should really be developing (or using open source) technology that can facilitate this.

How about &quot;develop our people&quot; for the next strategy? Regardless of windows/unix/linux/mac because the technology is just a tool. The people are the company&#039;s greatest information asset. 

Just a different perspective :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I understand, the CIO&#8217;s job really is to &#8216;work him/herself out of a job&#8217; so by rights, since 1999, the target should have changed. </p>
<p>I think the next trend in this should be to focus on the users, focus on making the most out of people&#8217;s individual knowledge as well as supporting more collaboration. We should really be developing (or using open source) technology that can facilitate this.</p>
<p>How about &#8220;develop our people&#8221; for the next strategy? Regardless of windows/unix/linux/mac because the technology is just a tool. The people are the company&#8217;s greatest information asset. </p>
<p>Just a different perspective <img src='http://www.colin-beveridge.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Falsetti</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/cio-strategy-art-science-or-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>John Falsetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=725#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Mystery, Art or Science? I think all of the above. MYSTERY: Can management clearly define (And I mean Clearly define. Without a doubt in Black and White) what their strategic goals are and the business challenges there are to meet the goals. ART: Securing management support and resources to meet the challenges over the long hall. SCIENCE: To make sure you have the right talent in your shop to pull it off. This cycle never ends. However that is what makes it fun!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mystery, Art or Science? I think all of the above. MYSTERY: Can management clearly define (And I mean Clearly define. Without a doubt in Black and White) what their strategic goals are and the business challenges there are to meet the goals. ART: Securing management support and resources to meet the challenges over the long hall. SCIENCE: To make sure you have the right talent in your shop to pull it off. This cycle never ends. However that is what makes it fun!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Parslow</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/cio-strategy-art-science-or-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Parslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=725#comment-266</guid>
		<description>From the headline, I was hoping for some insight to the strategy being developed by the government&#039;s CTO Council (for the CIO Council -  perhaps it&#039;s significant that they&#039;ve asked the CTOs to do it?). http://www.cio.gov.uk/documents/cto/pdf/enterprise_architecture_uk.pdf gives a taste, suggesting they&#039;re taking an Enterprise Architecture approach.

I&#039;m not a CIO. My last encounter with one (in a previous job), he seemed unhappy when my response (in a meeting) to &quot;who should write the Information Management Strategy?&quot; was that perhaps - as CIO - he should. He left the same day I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the headline, I was hoping for some insight to the strategy being developed by the government&#8217;s CTO Council (for the CIO Council &#8211;  perhaps it&#8217;s significant that they&#8217;ve asked the CTOs to do it?). <a href="http://www.cio.gov.uk/documents/cto/pdf/enterprise_architecture_uk.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cio.gov.uk/documents/cto/pdf/enterprise_architecture_uk.pdf</a> gives a taste, suggesting they&#8217;re taking an Enterprise Architecture approach.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a CIO. My last encounter with one (in a previous job), he seemed unhappy when my response (in a meeting) to &#8220;who should write the Information Management Strategy?&#8221; was that perhaps &#8211; as CIO &#8211; he should. He left the same day I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

