Like many others in the “logical” profession, I have been pre-conditioned to avoid complexity at every opportunity. Too often we seek simplicity where none really belongs.
The world depends on ambiguity variety and uncertainty so our systems must also have sufficient complexity; or as Ashby’s Law would call it: requisite variety.
Complexity and simplicity are not always antonyms. Sadly, in the drive for simplification, we are usually left with systems that simply cannot cope with complexity and that is when the real trouble begins.
You may also like to read:



Pingback: Twitter Trackbacks for Complexity is good | Fighting the Trillion Dollar Bonfire [colin-beveridge.com] on Topsy.com
Pingback: requisite variety