<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Done this level</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/done-this-level/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/done-this-level/</link>
	<description>joined-up management for a joined-up world ™ by Colin Beveridge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Done this level &#171; Webalist.eu</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/done-this-level/comment-page-1/#comment-4679</link>
		<dc:creator>Done this level &#171; Webalist.eu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=2232#comment-4679</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/done-this-level/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/done-this-level/" rel="nofollow">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/done-this-level/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Apthorp</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/done-this-level/comment-page-1/#comment-4654</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Apthorp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=2232#comment-4654</guid>
		<description>I was of course referring to VPEC-T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was of course referring to VPEC-T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Apthorp</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/done-this-level/comment-page-1/#comment-4653</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Apthorp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=2232#comment-4653</guid>
		<description>This idea seems to nicely bring together the principles that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lithandbook.com/?p=36&quot; title=&quot;VPECT&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;  tries to highlight; inparticular Values(Why are we in the game), Policy (Rules of the Game) and Trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This idea seems to nicely bring together the principles that <a href="http://www.lithandbook.com/?p=36" title="VPECT" rel="nofollow">  tries to highlight; inparticular Values(Why are we in the game), Policy (Rules of the Game) and Trust.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Lawn</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/done-this-level/comment-page-1/#comment-4515</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Lawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=2232#comment-4515</guid>
		<description>Excellent point Colin!

I think that one of the important aspects of tye &quot;game&quot; approach would be to recognise the self-interest aspect of individuals in organisations.
The Australian Public Service, and probably most Public Services, are almost completely crippled because the self-interest aspect completely overshadows the &quot;lets get the job done&quot; aspect. This is probably because the self-interest aspect is completely ignored in the definition of PS business units, processes, etc. Thus it exists oustide the rules, and flourishes like a black market.

Any model that treats the individual relistically, recognising individual motives such as promotion, renumeration, pride, approval seeking, power and contorl, etc. is bound to do a better job than the current approaches.

Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point Colin!</p>
<p>I think that one of the important aspects of tye &#8220;game&#8221; approach would be to recognise the self-interest aspect of individuals in organisations.<br />
The Australian Public Service, and probably most Public Services, are almost completely crippled because the self-interest aspect completely overshadows the &#8220;lets get the job done&#8221; aspect. This is probably because the self-interest aspect is completely ignored in the definition of PS business units, processes, etc. Thus it exists oustide the rules, and flourishes like a black market.</p>
<p>Any model that treats the individual relistically, recognising individual motives such as promotion, renumeration, pride, approval seeking, power and contorl, etc. is bound to do a better job than the current approaches.</p>
<p>Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

