Will broadband speed regulation blow out the oldfashioned IT smoke and mirrors?

The communications regulator (OFCOM) has introduced a new voluntary code of practice for broadband service providers, asking them to declare realistic (actual) speed performance for their customer connections. About time too, some of the major broadband providers have ignored serious customer disappointment for far too long.

turtle_uid_1104643.pngHuge discrepancies between advertised and achieved broadband speeds are a disgrace, cheating customers by charging way over the odds for the service actually provided and apparently doing little to manage their services effectively.  When challenged, the broadband providers have simply relied on some horribly oldfashioned arguments that have been no more than smoke and mirrors to disguise their own poor network management.

So the OFCOM initiative may be a voluntary code of practice but it is an important first step towards transparency and honesty in the broadband market.

Broadband networks, like rail networks, are vital components of our national infrastructure and deserve similar treatment. Perhaps the regulator should now look at introducing broadband performance penalties, like those we have seen applied to the train operating companies.

Another billion dollars on the bonfire?

The Trillion Dollar Bonfire is smouldering in air-conditioned helicopter hangars in Wiltshire. The National Audit Office has lambasted the procurement of eight Chinook helicopters, delivered in 2001 but still not fit for their intended role. The procurement has been described as “a gold-standard cock-up” and the original budget is  estimated to almost double, costing the UK Ministry of Defence nearer £500K. 

It’s a fairly safe bet that the final cost will escalate further. The UK taxpayers will probably have paid a billion dollars before the helicopters enter service.

Software problems have been cited as the reason for the disappointment and unexpected cost but I believe that the underlying problem is a colossal failure in the procurement process. A failure that is also repeated many times a week in many other businesses: a lack of due diligence when procuring technology.

I have seen major symptoms of similar failures throughout my interim career, where I have had to pick up the pieces of procurement failures.

We would all be much better off if we spent more time “looking under the bonnet” before signing up for new technology and if our own people haven’t got the necessary skills to properly assess the capabilities of a technology proposal, then we should make sure we find someone who can.

IT’s time for a paradigm shift

We regularly hear “there is no such thing as an IT project, only business initiatives.”

But we don’t need to look far to find business initiatives being managed as IT projects. The UK public sector is ripe with examples, such as the NHSpFIT, Medical Training Application Scheme (MTAS), Identity Cards, Farm Payment Scheme etc. etc.

Apart from the obvious combination of Government and IT project, each of these high-profile initiatives has two common themes: disappointment and unexpected cost.

We ignore this at our peril and we must ask why this still happens. Aren’t we getting better at IT?

Well the fact is that we are getting better at IT but the never ending series of expensive cock-ups shows that we are clearly not getting any better at managing change.

Of course, IT is not to blame, not the primary culprit for any failure. But poor selection and application of technology are crippling symptoms of a much bigger problem – our overwhelming subservience to the prevailing IT paradigm.

IT has become the be all and end all for far too many people. We call ourselves IT professionals; our magazines and newspapers deal exclusively in IT terms and far too many business interactions are predicated on the mistaken belief that IT needs to get closer to the business.

In my view, IT and business are already too close for comfort. Too close because the narrow focus on IT invariably neglects the broader nature of the overlying information systems, at great detriment to our ability to achieve effective information systems.

Of course, IT is a vital part of a modern system but by no means represents the whole recipe. After all, if you baked a cake with flour alone, your customers would not thank you for the results, they would rightly ask: what happened to the eggs, butter and sugar, do you expect me to eat this crumby mess?

To be honest, that is exactly what I think is happening with many of our so-called IT projects, we are forgetting to put in the proper ingredients.

An information system needs much more than dollops of technology, it needs proper proportions of people, organisation, process and data. Technology isn’t quite the icing on the cake but it should be measured in similar terms, if we want to achieve palatable results.

To deliver true value we need a whole new outlook, based holistically on information systems, not just information technology.   

A new IS paradigm will be a natural step, marking further progress in our evolutionary journey from the earlier paradigms of computing, data processing and IT.

We need to break free from the hobbles of the IT paradigm and start talking seriously about IS instead.  

Page 68 of 70« First...102067686970...Last »