Strategy is an abstract art

What is managing strategy really like? How good are you at really managing strategy? If you are not sure, here’s a very simple test:

Get a brand new jigsaw puzzle, open the box and empty all of the pieces onto your desk, face down.

Now, throw away the puzzle box, ask three friendly colleagues to remove an unspecified number of pieces each, at random, and to put the chosen pieces into their pockets, without showing them to you.

Your next task is to construct the jigsaw, quickly and accurately, without turning over any of the pieces.

If this scenario doesn’t daunt you sufficiently, ask one of your colleagues to blind-fold you…

That straightforward exercise is the easiest way I know to simulate the challenge facing most  strategists today.

We are continually faced with trying to create a cohesive and cost-effective outcome; given resources that we don’t completely understand, not all of which are under our direct influence, or control, and that may, or may not, eventually fit together into a recognisable pattern.

So much for the challenge, how can we tackle it?

Well, I think that the best way is to build a sustainable strategy model – a tangible* definition of the intricate framework of the various factors that influence our strategic management.

If you do this, you will start to make sense of even the most abstract picture.

*by “tangible definition,” I really do mean something that can be physically manifested and manipulated, either in the form of a printed report, or as an interactive computer model.

Strategy management is, without doubt, an art – and an abstract art at that.

You may also like to read:

  • http://marioferreira.wordpress.com Mario Luis Tavares Ferreira

    Once more, I agree with you 100%. Strategy is a truly abstract art that must present concrete and tangible results. It seems a contradiction, but it is the reality.

    The “discovery”, evaluation and materialisation of the large spectrum of factors that influence a strategy and its translation to prospective scenarios, (and that, in the futures, proves it self without many points out of curve) it is true art of strategy.

    Nowadays, we have many “strategists”, but few truly “wizards”.

    Cheers,

    Mario

  • Pingback: abstract strategy

  • http://innovators-inc.co.uk Saurav

    In my mind, strategy is a balanced mix of art and science. Talk to any Strategist today and they have to offer their own version of tabs, tools and templates to perfrom decision analysis, market figuratives, modelling etc. However, just tool might not help since data and statistics only tkae you that far. What is required is to take a look outside-in. Getting too obsessed with your numbers could get a giant like Apple, 3M, Toyota etc. to slow donw on thier innovation. Somewhere I see strategy to be a function of the ‘innovation quotient’ of the organization. First we see what is required and then we device a plan about how to provide it. One without the other is a definite failure.

    Saurav: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/chakrabortysaurabh82