Taboo Zoo

Picture credit: riverdaughter

Picture credit: riverdaughter

Why should so many business risks be kept off the record, because they are taboo subjects? We need to make sure that we are not acting as unofficial keepers of the taboo zoo.

Every organization has corporate taboos, difficult conversations that are avoided – either until a crisis finally flushes the subject out into the open, or until some brave soul grasps the initiative.

Very often this behaviour is  accompanied by metaphorical references to big beasts, for example “the elephant in the room” or the “gorilla in the corner.” Powerful beasts indeed. Nobody talks about the dormouse in the corner.

And yet the behaviour (avoidance of taboo subjects) is far more appropriate to a slightly lesser creature: the Ostrich, which is often portrayed as burying its head in the sand when confronted with a threat.

Picture credit: spartacus007

Picture credit: spartacus007

Elephants and Gorillas have strength and quiet dignity, whereas the Ostrich is ungainly and awkward – albeit fleet of foot.

Perhaps that’s why we subconsciously choose the more powerful comfort creatures to excuse our reticence.

We feel that it’s OK not to tackle such a powerful beast as an elephant or a gorilla  even though we are simply acting timidly by helping to sustain corporate taboos that will probably damage us later on.

We need to make sure that our business and personal culture doesn’t encourage us to bury our heads in the sand.

Whenever we duck an opportunity to deal with previously unspoken issues in a properly open and mature approach, we are building on the risk that we will soon find ourselves up to our armpits in alligators!

Picture credit: turtlemom4bacon

Picture credit: turtlemom4bacon

Maybe a good way of dealing with this problem is to add a new subsection to our corporate risk register: Taboo Zoo.

Perhaps for the first time, this approach would gives us a means of recording and expressing the very real risks that otherwise go deliberately unspoken in many organizations.

Why should any risk be off the record? Let’s get the taboos out into the open and enjoy better opportunities for properly joined-up management. Have you got a good way of dealing with your own taboo zoo?

You may also like to read:

  • http://www.malotaux.nl Niels Malotaux

    One of the reasons of the Taboo is that whistleblowers usually end-up without a job, or worse. If whistleblowing isn’t actively sollicited and rewarded within the organization, it will stay a taboo, probably.

  • http://livingwithrats.blogspot.com Julian Dobson

    It’s quite difficult as an employee to challenge such taboos without being labelled a troublemaker. As someone who runs my own business I’m very fortunate, and I hope we have an open and challengeable culture where people feel included and able to speak their minds – but that’s easier in a small company than a large one.

    My dealings with the public sector suggest the culture of covering your backside is widespread, which leads to stagnation and risk-aversion (perhaps we should call that the sloth in the corner, or the armadillo). And the voluntary sector can be little better: a few years ago I spent many months defending my wife at an industrial tribunal after she was sacked for whistleblowing. We won, but you pay a high price to fight those battles.

    • http://www.colin-beveridge.com colinb

      Julian

      thanks for your input, your points are well made. I really like the addition of the armadillo and the sloth to the taboo zoo.