<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology is always the easiest part</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/technology-is-always-the-easiest-part/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/technology-is-always-the-easiest-part/</link>
	<description>joined-up management for a joined-up world ™ by Colin Beveridge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Harley CISSP FBCS CITP</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/technology-is-always-the-easiest-part/comment-page-1/#comment-5816</link>
		<dc:creator>David Harley CISSP FBCS CITP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 09:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trilliondollarbonfire.com/?p=22#comment-5816</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all in favour of IT staff developing people skills (especially those who are primarily customer-facing, obviously), and have met many who badly need such development. 

On the other hand, it seems to me that business infrastructure is often maintained by people (in HR, payroll, PR and whatever) whose core competency should be their soft skills but frequently fall very, very short. 

I have to agree that it&#039;s not appropriate to assume that all the faults are on the side of the IT Crowd. I refer to that particular stereotype quite deliberately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all in favour of IT staff developing people skills (especially those who are primarily customer-facing, obviously), and have met many who badly need such development. </p>
<p>On the other hand, it seems to me that business infrastructure is often maintained by people (in HR, payroll, PR and whatever) whose core competency should be their soft skills but frequently fall very, very short. </p>
<p>I have to agree that it&#8217;s not appropriate to assume that all the faults are on the side of the IT Crowd. I refer to that particular stereotype quite deliberately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry Kahai, Ph.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/technology-is-always-the-easiest-part/comment-page-1/#comment-5750</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry Kahai, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 01:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trilliondollarbonfire.com/?p=22#comment-5750</guid>
		<description>I am a small business owner with an MIS background that melded technology with business. The reason for the rise of MIS programs years ago at universities was, in part, prompted by the very fact that managing technology required business, but not necessarily technical, skills. You try telling small business owners that business reasons should drive technology implementation and see the look on their faces! 

I believe that education is a key component of dealing effectively with the issues that users face. For example, in any new application or system deployment, research has shown that if users are involved in the initial decision-making leading up to a new deployment, users are more likely to accept the new system and throw their support behind it. Such research results call for effective change management strategies to reduce educate users on the benefits that accrue from new application / system deployments. 

As another example, in the area of information security, research again has shown that an educated workforce is less likely to commit errors that lead to security exposures. Additionally, security governance adds another dimension to the issue of dealing with users and keeping their computing activities from adversely impacting organizational resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a small business owner with an MIS background that melded technology with business. The reason for the rise of MIS programs years ago at universities was, in part, prompted by the very fact that managing technology required business, but not necessarily technical, skills. You try telling small business owners that business reasons should drive technology implementation and see the look on their faces! </p>
<p>I believe that education is a key component of dealing effectively with the issues that users face. For example, in any new application or system deployment, research has shown that if users are involved in the initial decision-making leading up to a new deployment, users are more likely to accept the new system and throw their support behind it. Such research results call for effective change management strategies to reduce educate users on the benefits that accrue from new application / system deployments. </p>
<p>As another example, in the area of information security, research again has shown that an educated workforce is less likely to commit errors that lead to security exposures. Additionally, security governance adds another dimension to the issue of dealing with users and keeping their computing activities from adversely impacting organizational resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David V. Corbin</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/technology-is-always-the-easiest-part/comment-page-1/#comment-5731</link>
		<dc:creator>David V. Corbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trilliondollarbonfire.com/?p=22#comment-5731</guid>
		<description>Early in my career, I decided that I loved applying technology to solve problems. I also decided that I did not want to follow the classic move to management that can isolate one from technology and make one&#039;s focus the management of people.

This was a major contributing factor to my move from being an employee in &quot;Corporate America&quot; to running my own consulting firm that specialized in the development of custom software solutions. Over the years, I have had a chance to work with many different technologies, and apply the appropriate one to create innovative and unique solutions for many clients.

But, technology does not live in a vacuum. To utilize it effectively, one must understand the real &quot;need&quot; that is driving the work; and as an outside consultant it is critical that the knowledgte is transfered to the client so that the result can be effectively utilized and maintained.

The end result is that communication (listening, asking questions, learning, advocating, mentoring, et. al.) with people is really the most important part of what I do. Looking back over the 25 years since I founded the company, it is surely the single biggest reason we have survived when other firms have all disappeared.

Ironic; isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early in my career, I decided that I loved applying technology to solve problems. I also decided that I did not want to follow the classic move to management that can isolate one from technology and make one&#8217;s focus the management of people.</p>
<p>This was a major contributing factor to my move from being an employee in &#8220;Corporate America&#8221; to running my own consulting firm that specialized in the development of custom software solutions. Over the years, I have had a chance to work with many different technologies, and apply the appropriate one to create innovative and unique solutions for many clients.</p>
<p>But, technology does not live in a vacuum. To utilize it effectively, one must understand the real &#8220;need&#8221; that is driving the work; and as an outside consultant it is critical that the knowledgte is transfered to the client so that the result can be effectively utilized and maintained.</p>
<p>The end result is that communication (listening, asking questions, learning, advocating, mentoring, et. al.) with people is really the most important part of what I do. Looking back over the 25 years since I founded the company, it is surely the single biggest reason we have survived when other firms have all disappeared.</p>
<p>Ironic; isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/technology-is-always-the-easiest-part/comment-page-1/#comment-5730</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trilliondollarbonfire.com/?p=22#comment-5730</guid>
		<description>In brief - play up the many  strengths of IT professionals,  speak of and treat them as  professionals. Success in business is about recognising the full spread of skills required to keep the business on top form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In brief &#8211; play up the many  strengths of IT professionals,  speak of and treat them as  professionals. Success in business is about recognising the full spread of skills required to keep the business on top form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

