<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ABC of Building a Senior Team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/the-abc-of-building-a-senior-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/the-abc-of-building-a-senior-team/</link>
	<description>joined-up management for a joined-up world ™ by Colin Beveridge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/the-abc-of-building-a-senior-team/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=640#comment-167</guid>
		<description>I doubt vey much whether you will be able to suddenly (ie within a period of 5 years)develop a pool of young aspiring managers. Whereas if we channel our efforts into talent management we may be able to gain head way. To me the issue is about raising the standards of senior management through pragmatic self assessment of their ability. Unfortunately &#039;business schools&#039; tend to focus on new methods and methodologies rather than corrective approaches. Consequently the criticism of academia per se therefore seems a little unfair. After acedemia is about the deveopment and growth of young people, whether they are commerce-friendly is another thing.
Senior management should be mature enough to stand up and be counted. For that you need good leaders, or at least decent role models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt vey much whether you will be able to suddenly (ie within a period of 5 years)develop a pool of young aspiring managers. Whereas if we channel our efforts into talent management we may be able to gain head way. To me the issue is about raising the standards of senior management through pragmatic self assessment of their ability. Unfortunately &#8216;business schools&#8217; tend to focus on new methods and methodologies rather than corrective approaches. Consequently the criticism of academia per se therefore seems a little unfair. After acedemia is about the deveopment and growth of young people, whether they are commerce-friendly is another thing.<br />
Senior management should be mature enough to stand up and be counted. For that you need good leaders, or at least decent role models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/the-abc-of-building-a-senior-team/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>David M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=640#comment-161</guid>
		<description>I have observed a real difference between senior teams in public and private sector organisations.  In the public sector I have seen on multiple occasions CEO&#039;s  ( Or equiv) systematicaly set about removing their most capable  subordinates.  This is of course to avoid political threat. Without the driver of   competitors and shareholders to demand performance from the senior team, there is no incentive to keep any level of competence in that senior team  .  Any higher  level scruitiny in these organisations will come from  politicians - who do not know of any other behaviour - so see the actions as normal.

What this means of course, is that when the CEO does eventualy leave, there is no successor available of any ability to take over - so one of a pool of even lesser ability  is destined to be the new CEO ...

and so we spiral down ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have observed a real difference between senior teams in public and private sector organisations.  In the public sector I have seen on multiple occasions CEO&#8217;s  ( Or equiv) systematicaly set about removing their most capable  subordinates.  This is of course to avoid political threat. Without the driver of   competitors and shareholders to demand performance from the senior team, there is no incentive to keep any level of competence in that senior team  .  Any higher  level scruitiny in these organisations will come from  politicians &#8211; who do not know of any other behaviour &#8211; so see the actions as normal.</p>
<p>What this means of course, is that when the CEO does eventualy leave, there is no successor available of any ability to take over &#8211; so one of a pool of even lesser ability  is destined to be the new CEO &#8230;</p>
<p>and so we spiral down &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: satish</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/the-abc-of-building-a-senior-team/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>satish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=640#comment-160</guid>
		<description>good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Shields</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/the-abc-of-building-a-senior-team/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=640#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Of course, this is diametrically opposed to what I just read here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/oct/23/dumbing-down about teaching the next generation of leaders....

Therefore, it follows that we&#039;re creating our own downfall, and the paradigm shift being called for needs to start at the University level....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, this is diametrically opposed to what I just read here: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/oct/23/dumbing-down" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/oct/23/dumbing-down</a> about teaching the next generation of leaders&#8230;.</p>
<p>Therefore, it follows that we&#8217;re creating our own downfall, and the paradigm shift being called for needs to start at the University level&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

