<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The eye in your mud, or the mud in your eye?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/the-eye-in-your-mud-or-the-mud-in-your-eye/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/the-eye-in-your-mud-or-the-mud-in-your-eye/</link>
	<description>joined-up management for a joined-up world ™ by Colin Beveridge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://www.colin-beveridge.com/index.php/the-eye-in-your-mud-or-the-mud-in-your-eye/comment-page-1/#comment-3454</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colin-beveridge.com/?p=1657#comment-3454</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree!
What is even more likely is that spreadsheets can cloud the fact that data is generated to provide the answer the presenter first thought of - data or no!
We&#039;ve all seen options&#039; appraisals manipulated by tweaking the starting values of the parameters.

That said - if tweaking the parameters on the basis of debate about their significance and sensitivity is done openly and in recognition of a range of participants&#039; subjectivity results in a decision, then sometimes some benefit can come from participants making a decision rather than not. It all depends on their understanding of what the decision making model means. If it&#039;s good the result may be helped by spreadsheets.

But how many participants have the time to do this and this decide blinded by dancing numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree!<br />
What is even more likely is that spreadsheets can cloud the fact that data is generated to provide the answer the presenter first thought of &#8211; data or no!<br />
We&#8217;ve all seen options&#8217; appraisals manipulated by tweaking the starting values of the parameters.</p>
<p>That said &#8211; if tweaking the parameters on the basis of debate about their significance and sensitivity is done openly and in recognition of a range of participants&#8217; subjectivity results in a decision, then sometimes some benefit can come from participants making a decision rather than not. It all depends on their understanding of what the decision making model means. If it&#8217;s good the result may be helped by spreadsheets.</p>
<p>But how many participants have the time to do this and this decide blinded by dancing numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

